Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laura Ortiz
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:25, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Laura Ortiz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Only hits on Gnews are false positives or trivial. Only roles are trivial characters. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 19:27, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:46, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:ENTERTAINER and WP:GNG. Epbr123 (talk) 08:24, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:40, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete a handful of exceedingly minor roles (some not even named, like "Cute Science Coed") do not equate to notability for encyclopedia purposes. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 13:46, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.